Student Deal — 55% off annual plans. Limited time. Claim Now →
Citations

Chicago Style Citation: Which of the Two Systems Do You Actually Need?

"Chicago style" is really two separate citation systems that look nothing alike in your paper — one uses footnotes, the other uses parenthetical author-year citations. Picking the wrong one means reformatting your entire reference list later, so here's how to tell which one your instructor or field actually expects.

✓ Free forever plan✓ No card needed✓ Used by 10,000+ students
Chicago's Two Systems, Side by Side
Notes-BibliographyFootnotes/endnotes + bibliography — humanities
Author-DateIn-text (Author Year) + reference list — sciences
Current EditionChicago Manual of Style, 18th ed. (2024)

Trusted by students at

UCLUniversity of ManchesterUniversity of EdinburghUCLAUniversity of TorontoUniversity of SydneyMcGillNYUMonashDurhamUCLUniversity of ManchesterUniversity of EdinburghUCLAUniversity of TorontoUniversity of SydneyMcGillNYUMonashDurham
1

Chicago style is actually two different systems

The Chicago Manual of Style (18th edition) lays out two distinct ways to cite sources, and it's explicit that neither one is "more correct" than the other — they're built for different kinds of writing. The Notes-Bibliography system cites sources with numbered footnotes or endnotes (a raised superscript number in the text, with the full citation at the bottom of the page or end of the paper), backed by a separate bibliography. Chicago's own guidance describes this as its oldest and most flexible option, and it's the standard choice in the humanities — literature, history, the arts.

The Author-Date system instead cites sources in parentheses right in the sentence — author's last name and publication year, like (Smith 2012), or (Smith 2012, 21–22) with a page number — matched to an alphabetized reference list at the end. This is the system Chicago itself describes as preferred in the sciences and social sciences, where publication date matters more to the reader than it does in a humanities paper.

2

What each one actually looks like on the page

In Notes-Bibliography, a first footnote reference might read: 1. Gabriel García Márquez, Love in the Time of Cholera, trans. Edith Grossman (London: Cape, 1988), 24. — with a shortened version used for any repeat citation of the same source, and a full bibliography entry at the end formatted slightly differently again (author's last name first, for alphabetizing).

In Author-Date, the same source appears in the reference list as: García Márquez, Gabriel. 1988. Love in the Time of Cholera. Translated by Edith Grossman. London: Cape. — alphabetized by author, no footnotes at all, with every in-text mention just the parenthetical author-year instead. The underlying source information is the same in both systems; only where and how it's presented changes.

3

How to know which one you need — and where a generator helps

Chicago doesn't default to one system over the other, so check your assignment sheet, your department's style guide, or your target journal's author guidelines before you format anything — an English literature essay almost always means Notes-Bibliography, while a psychology or biology paper more often means Author-Date, but that's a general pattern, not a rule, and it's always worth confirming directly.

StudyPilot's citation generator supports Chicago as one of its built-in styles alongside APA, MLA, Harvard, IEEE, and Vancouver, which handles the mechanical parts — author order, italics, punctuation — once you've confirmed your source details. Since Chicago covers two structurally different systems, it's still worth a quick check that the output matches whichever one (Notes-Bibliography or Author-Date) your instructor actually asked for before you turn in a final draft.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I know if I need Notes-Bibliography or Author-Date Chicago style?+
Check your assignment instructions or department style guide first — Chicago doesn't default to one system. As a general pattern, humanities papers (literature, history, arts) tend to use Notes-Bibliography, while sciences and social sciences tend to use Author-Date, but always confirm rather than assume.
Can I mix footnotes and a reference list in Chicago style?+
No — the two systems are meant to be used on their own, not combined. Notes-Bibliography uses footnotes/endnotes plus a bibliography; Author-Date uses in-text parenthetical citations plus a reference list. Pick one and use it consistently throughout the paper.
Is Chicago style the same as Turabian?+
They're closely related — Turabian is a student-focused adaptation of Chicago style, built around the same two underlying systems, but with some formatting differences aimed at student papers and theses rather than published work. Check which one your instructor specifically asked for.
What edition of Chicago style is currently standard?+
The Chicago Manual of Style is currently in its 18th edition (2024), per Chicago's own site. If your school hasn't updated its style guide references yet, it's worth confirming with your instructor whether they still expect 17th-edition conventions.

Format your reference list without the manual work

Paste in your source details and get properly formatted Chicago citations in seconds — then confirm it matches the system (Notes-Bibliography or Author-Date) your instructor wants.

Generate Citations Free →
✅ Free forever✅ No card✅ Used by 10,000+ students